Knowledge Management in Agricultural Succession

Knowledge Management in Agricultural Succession
复制标题

农业演替中的知识管理

DOI:
10.2457/srs.41.943
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Kiminami
L. Kiminami
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Toshinari Souma;L. Kiminami

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目前,日本的农业形势非常严峻。65岁或以上的基本农业工人的比率在2005年达到57. 4%,预计这些人将在不久的将来进入退休状态。因此,研究日本农业的继承管理是一个紧迫的课题。另一方面,现有的继承管理研究主要针对有形资产的继承,特别是耕地。但是,继承管理财产不仅包括农地等有形资产,还包括无形资产。此外,继任管理被认为能够通过将管理者的无形资产转换和转移到员工身上,为继任者创造新的知识。此外,“巴”作为知识创造场所的概念对继任管理也很重要。本文首先用FFS理论(Five Factors and Stress Theory)阐明日本农业演替管理中存在的问题,然后用SECI模型探讨“ba“在农业演替知识管理中的重要性。分类Q10摘要本研究通过对继承管理成为问题和第三方继承管理在短期内取得成功的两个案例的分析,阐明了无形资产继承的重要性和“ba“作为农业继承管理中知识创造的场所。但是,当无形资产传递给员工时,不仅传递了技能,管理者还应同时传递企业原则。这是可能的,通过形成“ba“和改变组织成为一个研究机构。因此,形成学习的“把”就成为管理者人才培养的第一步。然而,目前的研究还存在三个问题。首先是隐性知识的提取方法。隐性知识必须从各行政职能的具体工作中提取并验证,因为显性知识和隐性知识都存在于各行政职能中。第二是隐性知识的分类,因为隐性知识有两种,一种是由隐性转化为隐性的,另一种是由隐性转化为显性的。第三,阐明产业集群对农业演替管理的影响。一般来说,集群的形成预计将有利于确保各种人才。因此,必须验证是否可以获得用于确保场管理继任者的群集。这些都是未来的重要研究课题。
Today the situation of agriculture in Japan is extremely severe. The ratio of 65 - year - old or older basic agricultural workers reached 57.4% in 2005, and these people are expected to enter retirement in the near future. Therefore, studies on the management of the succession of Japanese agriculture is a pressing issue. On the other hand, existing research on succession management has chiefly targeted the succession of tangible assets, especially farmland. However, not only tangible assets such as farmland but also intangible assets should be included in the management properties of succession. Moreover, succession management is thought to be able to create new knowledge for the successors by converting and moving the manager’s intangible assets to the employees. In addition, the concept of “ ba ” as place of knowledge creation is also important for the management of succession. In this paper we first clarify the problems for the management of succession in Japanese agriculture using the FFS theory ( Five Factors and Stress Theory ) , and second discuss the importance of “ ba ” in the knowledge management of agricultural succession using the SECI model. Classification Q10 Abstract In the present study, both the importance of intangible asset succession and “ ba ” as the place of knowledge creation in succession management of agriculture were clarified through the analy-sis of two cases where the management of succession became a problem and where the management of succession to the third party has succeeded in a short term. However, when the intangible assets are passed on to the employee, not only the skills are transmitted, but also the manager should transmit the corporate principles at the same time. This is possible through the formation of “ ba ” and changing the organization into an institution of study. Therefore, the formation of “ ba ” for study becomes a first step in the personnel training as a manager. Nevertheless, there are three problems left in the present study. First is the method for extracting tacit knowledge. Tacit knowledge must be extracted from concrete work of each administrative function and verified because both explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge exist in each administrative function. Second is the classification of tacit knowledge because there are two kinds of tacit knowledge, one converted from tacit to tacit and the other converted from tacit to explicit. Third is clarification of the influence that industrial clusters have on the management of succession in agriculture. Generally, cluster formation is expected to be advantageous for securing various talents. Therefore, whether a cluster for securing a successor of farm management can be obtained must be verified. These are important research topics for the future.