Digitisation and Sovereignty in Humanitarian Space: Technologies, Territories and Tensions.
Digitisation and Sovereignty in Humanitarian Space: Technologies, Territories and Tensions.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Dijstelbloem, Huub
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin, Aaron;Sharma, Gargi;de Souza, Siddharth Peter;Taylor, Linnet;van Eerd, Boudewijn;McDonald, Sean Martin;Marelli, Massimo;Cheesman, Margie;Scheel, Stephan;Dijstelbloem, Huub
关于数字时代主权的限度和可能性的辩论正在进行中。尽管大多数观察人士强调了互联网、加密货币、人工智能/机器学习和先进的数据分析对民族国家主权的影响，但一个关键但尚未得到审查的问题涉及数字创新对人道主义领域的权威、权力和控制意味着什么，人们认为在人道主义领域，不同的规则、价值观和期望适用于这些领域。这个论坛聚集了从业者和学者，从概念和经验两方面探讨援助中的数字化和数据通信是如何(重新)塑造人道主义领域主权国家的概念的。该论坛的撰稿人对新形式的数字人道主义行动中对主权的既定理解提出了挑战。在其他重点领域中，该论坛提请注意网络依赖如何威胁国际人道主义组织所谓的数字主权。它还质疑区块链等技术有可能彻底改变人道主义援助中的主权概念，并质疑有关人道主义技术不可避免的寄生特性的假设。该论坛最后提出，在移民背景下部署的数字技术可以被理解为“主权实验”。我们邀请来自学术界、政策界和实践者社区的读者与这些关于数字化和人道主义空间主权的批评观点密切接触。
Debates are ongoing on the limits of – and possibilities for – sovereignty in the digital era. While most observers spotlight the implications of the Internet, cryptocurrencies, artificial intelligence/machine learning and advanced data analytics for the sovereignty of nation states, a critical yet under examined question concerns what digital innovations mean for authority, power and control in the humanitarian sphere in which different rules, values and expectations are thought to apply. This forum brings together practitioners and scholars to explore both conceptually and empirically how digitisation and datafication in aid are (re)shaping notions of sovereign power in humanitarian space. The forum’s contributors challenge established understandings of sovereignty in new forms of digital humanitarian action. Among other focus areas, the forum draws attention to how cyber dependencies threaten international humanitarian organisations’ purported digital sovereignty. It also contests the potential of technologies like blockchain to revolutionise notions of sovereignty in humanitarian assistance and hypothesises about the ineluctable parasitic qualities of humanitarian technology. The forum concludes by proposing that digital technologies deployed in migration contexts might be understood as ‘sovereignty experiments’. We invite readers from scholarly, policy and practitioner communities alike to engage closely with these critical perspectives on digitisation and sovereignty in humanitarian space.
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Bhagat, Ali;Roderick, Leanne
通讯作者：
Roderick, Leanne
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Aradau, Claudia
通讯作者：
Aradau, Claudia
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Cheesman, Margie
通讯作者：
Cheesman, Margie