Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography
Who Counts? Gender, Gatekeeping, and Quantitative Human Geography
复制标题
谁算数？
DOI：
10.31235/osf.io/ucfyd
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
David O’Sullivan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rachel S. Franklin;Victoria Houlden;Caitlin Robinson;Daniel Arribas;E. Delmelle;Urška Demšar;H. Miller;David O’Sullivan
学科如何被代表和复制是一个充满争议的问题。特别是在地理方面，挑战不仅在于谁重要，特别是在性别和其他因素方面，而且在于如何划定学科的界限以及承认哪些子领域。这篇文章有助于这两个方面的讨论，最近的研究性别，国际化和学术把关人文地理学的其他子领域。特别是，我们专注于旗舰定量地理期刊编辑团队的人口结构和国际多样性。我们发现，在我们的样本中，女性的代表性不足，份额范围从23.1到43.5，不幸的是，与许多其他地理期刊相比，女性的比例很低。我们还发现，职业生涯阶段是一个重要的因素，我们的样本是更多的国际化和英语比学科规范。最后，我们强调的重要性，参加在地理和其他地方的包容性守门的问题。
How academic disciplines are represented and reproduced is a charged issue. In geography in particular, the challenge is not only who counts, especially with regard to gender and other factors, but also how the boundaries of the discipline are drawn and which subfields are acknowledged. This article contributes to both aspects of the discussion by extending recent research on gender, internationalization, and academic gatekeeping to additional subfields of human geography. In particular, we focus on the demographic structure and international diversity of the editorial teams of flagship quantitative geography journals. We find that women are underrepresented in our sample, with shares ranging from 23.1 to 43.5 percent—numbers unfortunately comparable to many other geography journals. We also find that career stage is an important factor and that our sample is more international and less Anglophone than the disciplinary norm. We conclude by emphasizing the importance of attending to issues of inclusive gatekeeping in geography and elsewhere.
影响因子：
7.1
作者：
Hopkins, Peter
通讯作者：
Hopkins, Peter
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Faria, Caroline;Falola, Bisola;Torres, Rebecca Maria
通讯作者：
Torres, Rebecca Maria