The Physiology of the Newborn Infant

The Physiology of the Newborn Infant
复制标题

新生儿的生理学

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1977
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Louis Gluck
Louis Gluck
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Louis Gluck

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这是感兴趣的审查的趋势,在书籍的新生儿和围产期领域。不久前,只有三本主要的教科书:克莱门特·A·罗德曼博士的《新生儿生理学》。史密斯;新生儿的管理,由亚瑟帕玛利博士;和早产儿博士贝丽尔角。后来谢弗又增加了新生儿疾病。这些文本有一个共同的主要特点:每一个都是由一个作者写的。今天,我们正处于一个名副其实的雪崩的多作者的书籍对新生儿和围产期医学。多人合著的书籍似乎是沿着沿着两条线发展的。一种是作为一本标准教科书,编辑(或编辑)制定一个计划,并招募一些作者,他们撰写的章节可能重叠或没有相互关系,并以各种风格写作。他们往往不客观,
It is of interest to review the trend in books about the newborn and perinatal areas. Not long ago there were only three major texts: The Physiology of the Newborn Infant , by Dr Clement A. Smith; The Management of the Newborn , by Dr Arthur Parmalee; and The Premature Infant by Dr Beryl Corner. Later Schaffer added Diseases of the Newborn . These texts had in common one major characteristic: each was written by a single author. Today we are in the midst of a veritable avalanche of multi-authored books on the newborn and perinatal medicine. Multi-authored books seem to be developed along two lines. One is as a standard textbook in which the editor (or editors) lays out a plan and recruits a number of authors who write chapters that may overlap or have no interrelationship and who write in a variety of styles. Frequently, they are not objective and some