The reality of protecting the Rohingya: An inherent limitation of the responsibility to protect
The reality of protecting the Rohingya: An inherent limitation of the responsibility to protect
复制标题
保护罗兴亚人的现实：保护责任的固有局限性
DOI：
10.1080/14799855.2018.1547709
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yukiko Nishikawa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
日下渉;Isamu Okada;久保慶明・岡田勇・柳至;村上勇介;日下渉;Wataru Kusaka;日下渉;日下渉;岡田勇・久保慶明・柳至;日下渉・吉澤あすな;村上勇介;岡田勇;Yukiko Nishikawa
本文探讨了保护责任(R2P)概念在缅甸罗兴亚人面临的危机中的适用性，并讨论了R2P在某些情况下用处有限的原因。自从R2P得到东盟的承认以来，东盟内部正在进行的社区建设活动使人们乐观地认为，尽管该组织历来不干涉个别国家的内政，但该组织成员国将更加重视人权。然而，东盟对罗兴亚危机的立场可以用光说不做来形容。在承认R2P在某些情况下保护人民免遭大规模暴行方面的价值的同时，文章指出了R2P依赖于特定的主权话语的关键缺陷。因此，它认为，R2P不仅对罗辛亚人(缅甸将其视为无国籍非公民)的用处有限，甚至可能加剧局势。
This article explores the applicability of the notion of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in reference to the crisis faced by the Rohingya in Myanmar, and it discusses why the R2P has limited usefulness in certain cases. Since R2P came to be recognized by ASEAN, ongoing community-building activities within the ASEAN led to optimism that member countries would give increased attention to human rights, despite the organization’s historic practice of non-intervention in individual states’ internal affairs. However, the ASEAN’s stance regarding the Rohingya crisis can be described as all talk and no action. While recognizing the value of the R2P in protecting people from mass atrocities in certain contexts, the article points out the critical flaw that R2P rests on a particular discourse of sovereignty. Thus, it argues that the R2P not only has limited usefulness in the case of the Rohingya (whom Myanmar treats as stateless non-citizens) but could even exacerbate the situation.