Water quality, nutrients and the European union's Water Framework Directive in a lowland agricultural region: Suffolk, south-east England.
Water quality, nutrients and the European union's Water Framework Directive in a lowland agricultural region: Suffolk, south-east England.
复制标题
低地农业地区的水质、营养物质和欧盟水框架指令:英格兰东南部萨福克。
DOI:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.040
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Neal
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Howden;M. Bowes;A. Clark;N. Humphries;C. Neal
The water quality of 13 rivers in the lowland, agricultural county of Suffolk is investigated using routine monitoring data for the period 1981 to 2006 collected by the Environment Agency of England and Wales (EA), and its predecessors, with particular emphasis on phosphorus (as total reactive phosphorus, TRP) and total (dissolved and particulate) oxidised nitrogen (TOxN — predominantly nitrate NO3). Major ion and flow data are used to outline fundamental hydrochemical characteristics related to the groundwater provenance of base-flow waters. Relative load contributions from point and diffuse sources are approximated using Load Apportionment Modelling for both TRP and TOxN where concurrent flow and concentration data are available. Analyses indicate a mixture of point and diffuse sources of TRP, with the former being dominant during low flow periods, while for TOxN diffuse sources dominate. Out of 59 sites considered, 53 (90%) were found to have annual average TRP concentrations greater than 0.05 mg P l−1, and 36 (61%) had average concentrations over 0.120 mg P l−1, the upper thresholds for ‘High’ and ‘Good’ ecological status, respectively. Correspondingly, for TOxN, most of the rivers are already within 70% of the 11.3 mg N l−1threshold, with two rivers (Wang and Ore) being consistently greater than this. It is suggested that the major challenge is to characterise and control point-source TRP inputs which, being predominant during the late spring and summer low-flow period, coincide with the peak of primary biological production, thus presenting the major challenge to achieving ‘good’ ecological status under the Water Framework Directive. Results show that considerable effort is still required to ensure appropriate management and develop tools for decision-support.