EXTRACTION AND MULTIPLE SELECTION IN PP
EXTRACTION AND MULTIPLE SELECTION IN PP
复制标题
PP中的提取和多重选择
DOI：
10.1515/tlir.1990.7.2.169
复制
发表时间：
1990
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Larson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Larson
在大多数理论中，某个词项选择两个或两个以上类别的补语这一事实并不被认为对该词项出现的任何单一派生词有任何影响。因此，believe选择一个从句的事实被认为在（la）的推导中没有作用，因此与（la）的推导无关。在这篇文章中，我研究了英语中小句补语PP的事实，这些事实表明，与这种观点相反，多重次范畴化确实可能在派生中发挥实质性作用。特别是，我研究运动的影响，在某些PP似乎取决于其介词头的组合次范畴化属性。我认为，这一观察可以解释为允许“多重选择”，即一个词项格和Θ-标记不同的补语在不同的代表性水平在一个单一的派生。我认为，这一建议遵循乔姆斯基（1981，1986 a）的投射原理的一种可信的阅读。
Under most theories, the fact that a certain lexical item selects two or more categories of complements is not assumed to have any consequences with respect to any single derivation in which the item appears. Thus the fact that believe selects a clause is taken to play no part in, and hence to be irrelevant to the derivation underlying (la). In this note I examine facts concerning clausally complemented PPs in English which suggest that, contrary to this view, multiple subcategorization may indeed play a Substantive role in derivations. In particular, I examine movement effects in certain PPs that appear to depend on the combined subcategorization properties of their prepositional heads. I argue that this observation can be accounted for by allowing "multiple selection", whereby a lexical item Caseand Θ-marks different complements at different levels of representation in a single derivation. I suggest that this proposal follows under one plausible reading of the Projection Principle of Chomsky (1981, 1986a).