Evaluating the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire: Comparison of the Reliability, Factor Structure, and Predictive Validity across Five Versions
Evaluating the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire: Comparison of the Reliability, Factor Structure, and Predictive Validity across Five Versions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/sltb.12129
复制
发表时间：
2015-06-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Pettit, Jeremy W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hill, Ryan M.;Rey, Yasmin;Pettit, Jeremy W.
最近的研究中使用了五个版本的人际需求问卷 (INQ)，这是一种自我报告的衡量感知负担和归属感受挫的方法（包括 10、12、15、18 和 25 项）。使用不同版本的关于感知负担、归属感受挫和自杀意念之间关联的研究结果是混杂的，这可能是由于测量量表的差异。本研究评估了三个样本中这五个版本的因子结构、内部一致性和同时预测有效性。样本 1 和样本 2 分别由 449 名和 218 名本科生组成；样本 3 包括 114 名青少年精神病住院患者。所有版本都表现出可接受的内部一致性。 10 项版本和 15 项版本在验证性因素分析中展示了最佳、最一致的模型拟合。仅在 10 项 INQ 中，感知到的负担和受挫的归属感都一致预测并发的自杀意念。未来的研究应考虑使用 15 项或 10 项版本。
Five versions of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ), a self-report measure of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness, have been used in recent studies (including 10-, 12-, 15-, 18-, and 25-items). Findings regarding the associations between perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and suicidal ideation using different versions have been mixed, potentially due to differences in measurement scales. This study evaluated factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent predictive validity of these five versions in three samples. Samples 1 and 2 were comprised of 449 and 218 undergraduates, respectively; Sample 3 included 114 adolescent psychiatric inpatients. All versions demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. The 10-item version and 15-item version demonstrated the best, most consistent model fit in confirmatory factor analyses. Both perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness consistently predicted concurrent suicidal ideation on the 10-item INQ only. Future research should consider using the 15-item or 10-item versions.