Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses
Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses
复制标题
可调节多焦点人工晶状体的视觉性能
DOI：
10.18240/ijo.2017.02.09
复制
发表时间：
2017-02-18
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Xie, Li-Xin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lan, Jie;Huang, Yu-Sen;Xie, Li-Xin
目的：比较可调节人工晶状体与多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的视功能效果。方法：我们的回顾性比较研究包括51例（60只眼）接受调节性IOL（Tetraflex; 16例，20只眼）、屈光性多焦点IOL（ReZoom; 18例，20只眼）或衍射性多焦点IOL（ZMA 00; 17例，20只眼）植入的患者。结果：3组的等效球镜分别为-0.38 ± 0.54D、0.14 ± 0.56D和0.35 ± 0.41D;各组间裸眼视力、矫正远视力和裸眼中间视力差异无统计学意义（P=0.39）。ReZoom组的远距矫正中间视力显著优于ZMA 00组（P=0.003）。ZMA 00组的近视力明显优于其他组（P
AIM: To compare the visual functional outcomes with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). 0METHODS: Our retrospective comparative study included 51 patients (60 eyes) received implantation of an accommodating IOL (Tetraflex; 16 patients, 20 eyes), a refractive multifocal IOL (ReZoom; 18 patients, 20 eyes), or a diffractive multifocal IOL (ZMA00; 17 patients, 20 eyes). Subjective refraction, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS), intraocular aberration, and subjective photic phenomena were detected at 3mo after surgery.RESULTS: The spherical equivalent in the three groups was -0.38 +/- 0.54 D, 0.14 +/- 0.56 D, and 0.35 +/- 0.41 D, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity among the groups (P=0.39). The ReZoom group had significantly better distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity than the ZMA00 group (P=0.003). The ZMA00 group had significantly better near visual acuity than the other groups (P