Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause
Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause
复制标题
主要出现在主条款中的协议
DOI：
10.1075/la.190.04miy
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Shigeru Miyagawa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shigeru Miyagawa
大多数协议系统的目标是句子中的一个语法实体，通常是主语，但在某些情况下是宾语或与格。还有另一种语言是以听话者为目标的，比如巴斯克方言Soulett。我将研究这类所谓的他律协议，并探讨两个主要问题。首先，虽然它针对的是听话人，但协议的形式与用于主语/宾语的常规Phi-Feature协议是相同的。这意味着同位协议必须是探测-目标关系的一部分，这导致了这样一个问题：目标在哪里？我认为，罗斯的行为分析提供了第二人称目标。其次，同位一致在日语中的分布与动词上的礼貌标记在本质上是相同的，这导致了这样的假设：尽管日语被描述为典型的非一致语言，但礼貌标记实际上是第二人称一致的实现。此外，日语中的这一同素协议有一个分布范围，这使得它只限于Emonds(1969)最初设想的词根从句。
Most agreement systems target a grammatical entity within the sentence, typically the subject but in some cases the object or the dative. There is another kind of agreement found in languages such as Souletin, a Basque dialect, that targets the hearer. I will look at this type of so-called allocutive agreement and pursue two main issues. First, although it targets the hearer, the form of the agreement is the same as the regular phi-feature agreement used for subject/object. This means that the allocutive agreement must be part of a probe-goal relation, leading to the question, where is the goal? I argue that something like Ross’s Performative Analysis furnishes the second-person goal. Second, the distribution of the allocutive agreement is essentially the same as the politeness marking on the verb in Japanese, which leads to the hypothesis that, despite Japanese being characterized as a typical agreementless language, the politeness marker is, in fact, an implementation of second-person agreement. Moreover, this allocutive agreement in Japanese has a distribution that limits it to the root clause as originally conceived by Emonds (1969).
日本 J.Appl.Phys.24-7。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
通讯作者：
--