Reply to “Comment on ‘Evidence that the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake Could Not Have Been Induced by the Zipingpu Reservoir’ by Kai Deng, Shiyong Zhou, Rui Wang, Russell Robinson, Cuiping Zhao, and Wanzheng Cheng” by Shemin Ge
Reply to “Comment on ‘Evidence that the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake Could Not Have Been Induced by the Zipingpu Reservoir’ by Kai Deng, Shiyong Zhou, Rui Wang, Russell Robinson, Cuiping Zhao, and Wanzheng Cheng” by Shemin Ge
复制标题
DOI：
10.1785/0120110099
复制
发表时间：
2011-12
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Shiyong Zhou;Kai Deng
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shiyong Zhou;Kai Deng
2008年汶川大地震是否是由紫坪铺大坝后面的水库引发的仍在讨论中（Kalpna和Gahalaut，2010; Kerr和Stone，2010; Zhou等人，2010）。Ge等人（2009）根据紫坪铺水库在汶川地震初始破裂点引起的库仑应力变化的计算结果，提出紫坪铺水库使汶川地震的发生加速了数十至数百年。然而，我们最近的类似工作（Deng et al.，2010）表明，库仑应力变化本身既不够大，也没有正确的符号来促进这场灾难性的地震。Ge（2011）的评论指出，我们（Deng et al.，2010）在计算孔隙压力时，忽略了一个关键项（不排水响应压力），从而进一步推断我们的结论是不合理的。我们非常同意Ge的观点，即不排水响应压力是计算孔隙压力的关键项，我们出版物中计算的孔隙压力实际上包括了不排水响应压力，这在我们的论文（Deng et al.，2010）第2807页有描述。我们承认图3b...
Whether the disastrous 2008 Wenchuan earthquake was or was not triggered by the reservoir behind the Zipingpu Dam is still under discussion (Kalpna and Gahalaut, 2010; Kerr and Stone, 2010; Zhou et al. , 2010). Ge et al. (2009) presented a result suggesting that Zipingpu reservoir hastened the occurrence of the Wenchuan earthquake by tens to hundreds of years based on the calculation of the Coulomb stress change induced by the Zipingpu Reservoir at the initial rupture point of the Wenchuan earthquake. However, our recent similar work (Deng et al. , 2010) indicated that Coulomb stress changes alone were neither large enough nor of the correct sign to promote this disastrous earthquake. The comment by Ge (2011) states that the reservoir-induced Coulomb stress change computed by us (Deng et al. , 2010) omitted a crucial term (undrained response pressure) in calculating pore pressure and further infers that our conclusions are unsound. We quite agree with Ge that the undrained response pressure is a crucial term in calculating pore pressure, and the pore pressure calculated in our publication actually included the undrained response pressure, which was described on p. 2807 of our paper (Deng et al. , 2010). We admit that figure 3b …