Test-retest reliability and practice effects of Expanded Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery
Test-retest reliability and practice effects of Expanded Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s1355617799544056
复制
发表时间：
1999-05-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Temkin, NR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dikmen, SS;Heaton, RK;Temkin, NR
对384名正常或神经学稳定的成年人进行了一系列神经心理学测量的重测信度和实践效果的检验。中位测试-复测间隔为11个月(3-16个月)。大多数测量的可靠性估计都相当不错，从0.70到0.90度不等。例外的是，大多数记忆测量的可靠性相对较差。对于所有测试措施，初始测试的值是第二次测试的值的重要决定因素。实践效果在大多数措施上都能看到。然而，练习效果的大小随着参与者的测量类型、重测间隔、年龄和总体能力水平而变化。这项研究提供了几种类型的重测信息，这些信息可能对未来的研究和临床工作有用：各种测量的比较可靠性，与每次给药相关的误差变异性的估计，变化的标准偏差，以及各种测试的实践影响的比较大小。
Test-retest reliabilities and practice effects of a broad range of neuropsychological measures were examined in 384 normal or neurologically stable adults. Median test-retest interval was 11 months (range 3-16 months). The reliability estimates for most of the measures are reasonably good, ranging from .70 to low .90s. en exception is the relatively poor reliabilities of most memory measures. For all test measures, the value on initial testing is a strong determinant of the value on the second examination. Practice effects are seen on most measures. The magnitude of the practice effects, however, varies as a function of type of measure, test-retest interval, age, and overall competency level, of the participant. This study provides several types of retest information that may be useful for future research and clinical work: comparative reliabilities of the various measures, estimate of error variability associated with each administration, standard deviation of the change, and comparative magnitude of practice effects on various tests.