IPBES and Biodiversity Expertise: Regional, Gender, and Disciplinary Balance in the Composition of the Interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel
IPBES and Biodiversity Expertise: Regional, Gender, and Disciplinary Balance in the Composition of the Interim and 2015 Multidisciplinary Expert Panel
复制标题
IPBES 和生物多样性专业知识：临时和 2015 年多学科专家小组组成中的区域、性别和学科平衡
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Borie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jasper Montana;M. Borie
生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台（IPBES）是一个专家机构，有望改变生物多样性和生态系统服务的治理。政府间科学政策平台扩大了以前的举措，并将自己定位为一个知识政策接口，对了解生物多样性的不同方式开放。在本文中，我们分析了政府间科学政策平台采用的区域、性别和学科平衡原则如何应用于多学科专家小组（MEP）：负责政府间科学政策平台科学和技术职能并嵌入其知识创造实践的专家机构。在此过程中，我们比较了2013年临时管理和监督委员会成员的选择与2015年新的管理和监督委员会成员的选择，发现性别和学科平衡略有改善，这在联合国各区域集团中有所不同。根据政府间科学政策平台的雄心，还有很大的改进余地，但在政府间环境中“开放”专门知识证明具有挑战性。
The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is an expert institution expected to transform the governance of biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES expands on previous initiatives and positions itself as a knowledge‐policy interface open to different ways of knowing biodiversity. In this contribution, we analyze how the principles of regional, gender, and disciplinary balance that were adopted by IPBES have been applied to the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel (MEP): the body of experts responsible for the scientific and technical functions of IPBES and embedded in its knowledge‐making practices. In doing so, we compare the selection of the interim MEP in 2013 with the new MEP in 2015 and find a small improvement in gender and disciplinary balance that varies across the United Nations regional groupings. According to the ambition of IPBES, there is significant room for improvement, but “opening‐up” expertise in an intergovernmental setting proves challenging.