Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)

Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)
复制标题

国际图联书目记录功能要求 (FRBR) 的实验

DOI:
10.1045/september2002-hickey
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
D Lib Mag.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jenny Toves
Jenny Toves
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thom Hickey;E. O'Neill;Jenny Toves

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

OCLC正在研究如何最好地实施国际图联的书目记录功能要求(FRBR)。作为这项工作的一部分,我们已经进行了一系列实验,使用算法将现有的书目记录分组为作品和表达。我们开发的算法在处理记录子集和整个WorldCat数据库时取得了合理的成功,识别出了作品的所有表现形式。背景国际图联报告《书目记录的功能要求》(Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records,IFLA)对人们如何看待书目数据产生了深远的影响。通过提出关于书目记录的数据关系的想法,将实践和理论正确地结合起来,该报告已经能够捕捉到广泛的从业者和学者的想象力。很明显,任何对书目项目之间的关系感兴趣的人至少需要考虑FRBR(例如,[Lagoze和Hunter])。
OCLC is investigating how best to implement IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). As part of that work, we have undertaken a series of experiments with algorithms to group existing bibliographic records into works and expressions. Working with both subsets of records and the whole WorldCat database, the algorithm we developed achieved reasonable success identifying all manifestations of a work.BackgroundThe IFLA report Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records [IFLA] is having a profound impact on how people look at bibliographic data. By presenting ideas about the data relationships of bibliographic records with the right mixture of practice and theory, the report has been able to capture the imagination of a wide range of both practitioners and academics. It seems clear that, at a minimum, anyone interested in the relationships between bibliographic items needs to take FRBR into account (eg,[Lagoze and Hunter]).