:The Sea Peoples and Their World: A Reassessment
:The Sea Peoples and Their World: A Reassessment
复制标题
:海洋民族和他们的世界：重新评估
DOI：
10.1086/422282
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
H. Genz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Genz
宾夕法尼亚大学考古学与人类学博物馆。这17篇论文涵盖了与东地中海从青铜时代到铁器时代的过渡时期有关的广泛主题。包括考古和图像材料的讨论，以及埃及，圣经，乌加里特和赫梯文本的调查。在他的讨论埃及文本从Medinet哈布有关战役的拉美西斯三世对海洋民族，D。Redford（pp. 1-20）指出，他们不能不加批判地作为直接的历史来源，因为他们是宣传的性质，以及深深植根于埃及文体惯例。I.歌手（pp. 21-33）总结了证据结束的赫梯帝国根据叙利亚和赫梯文本。特别是，乌加里特的信件很好地说明了赫梯帝国在最后几年的衰落。1歌手的尝试（pp. 27-28）涉及从Bogazköy的南堡题字的运动Suppiluliuma II对海洋民族，谁已经登陆沿着南安纳托利亚海岸，必须接受一些保留，但是。由于苏比卢卢乌玛二世统治时期的记载不多，我们无法将历史上记载的少数事件按时间顺序排列。到目前为止，没有证据证明辛格的假设，即把对塞浦路斯（阿拉希亚）的战役放在对卢卡土地和塔洪塔萨的战役之前。2A. Caubet（pp. 35-51）介绍了在Ras Shamra/Ugarit正在进行的挖掘的结果，说明了在青铜时代的最后阶段，在公元前12世纪初被摧毁之前，城市中的生活据她说，没有证据表明乌加里特在被摧毁后立即重新定居。暂时确定为LHIIIC物质的碎片3应归类为LHIIIB晚期物质（第49页）。
University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology. The seventeen papers cover a wide range of topics associated with the transitional period from the Bronze to the Iron Age in the Eastern Mediterranean. Included are discussions of archaeological and iconographic material as well as investigations of Egyptian, biblical, Ugaritic, and Hittite texts. In his discussion of the Egyptian texts from Medinet Habu relating to the battles of Ramses III against the Sea Peoples, D. Redford (pp. 1–20) points out that they cannot be taken uncritically as direct historical sources, since they are propagandistic in nature as well as deeply rooted in Egyptian stylistic conventions. I. Singer (pp. 21–33) sums up the evidence for the end of the Hittite Empire according to Syrian and Hittite texts. In particular, the letters from Ugarit illustrate very well the waning power of the Hittite Empire during its last years. 1 Singer’s attempt (pp. 27–28) to relate the Südburg Inscription from Bogazköy to a campaign of Suppiluliuma II against the Sea Peoples, who had landed along the South Anatolian coast, has to be accepted with some reservation, however. The poorly documented reign of Suppiluliuma II does not allow us to put the few historically documented events in a definitive chronological order. Thus far, there is no proof for Singer’s assumption to put the campaign against Cyprus (Alashia) before the campaign against the Lukka lands and Tarhuntassa. 2A. Caubet (pp. 35–51) presents the results from the ongoing excavations at Ras Shamra/Ugarit, illustrating the life in the city during the last phase of the Bronze Age, before the destruction at the beginning of the twelfth century bc According to her, there is no evidence for a resettlement of Ugarit immediately after the destruction. Sherds tentatively identified as LHIIIC material3 should be classified as late LHIIIB material (p. 49).