Analysis of trace elements in zircon at high mass resolving power using forward-geometry secondary ion mass spectrometry
Analysis of trace elements in zircon at high mass resolving power using forward-geometry secondary ion mass spectrometry
复制标题
使用正向几何二次离子质谱法以高质量分辨率分析锆石中的痕量元素
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
John Valley
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tyler Blum;Kouki Kitajima;Noriko Kita;John Valley
Trace elements in zircon form the basis for estimates of magmatic pressures, temperatures, and differentiation, providing tools to understand magma evolution throughout Earth history. Recently, empirical relations have led to the proposal that specific trace elements, including Sc-Y-Nb-Ce-Yb-Hf-U, are distinctive of different tectonic settings on the modern Earth [1]. Broader application of these relations has been tempered, in part, by the challenges associated with accurate and reproducible measurement of Sc and Nb; each has a single naturally occurring isotope, and require m /Δ m >12000 and m /Δ m >14000 to resolve interferences with 90 Zr ++ and 92 ZrH + , respectively. We present analytical methods for maintaining accurate magnetic field calibration for days-to-weeks at a mass resolving power=12500 ( m /Δ m, full width at 10% peak height) on the large-radius, forward-geometry IMS-1280. Maintaining accurate positioning on peaks during magnetic field cycling requires ±15ppm precision (Δ m / m, full width at 95% peak height) while accounting for drift and perturbations. To achieve this, we monitor count rates at the approximate half-height-width of specific major element and metal-oxide peaks; relative count rates are used to make small (ppm-level) adjustments to the magnetic field settings for these and 26 other interpolated trace element masses after each analysis. Regular analysis of reference materials over >10 days shows the majority of measured trace elements, including Sc and Nb, have relative analytical uncertainties at or below 10%. Heterogeneous and/or low concentration elements show variability comparable to the ranges cited in published literature. Detection limits and precision benefit from (1) an RF-plasma source with higher beam density (5.5nA