A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures
A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.008
复制
发表时间：
2006-06-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Fresco, DM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cogswell, A;Alloy, LB;Fresco, DM
尽管捕捉个体在行为抑制(BIS)和接近系统(BAS)敏感性上的差异具有假定的适用性和启发性价值，但该领域尚未就自我报告工具的选择达成广泛一致。目前的研究评估了可能是最强的两个候选者，BIS/BAS量表(Carver&White，1994)和惩罚敏感度和奖励敏感度问卷(SPSRQ；Torrubia，Avila，Molto，&Casera，2001)。在两个大学样本中使用验证性和探索性因素分析技术，我们确定这两个衡量标准都没有达到与我们的数据集足够匹配的程度，并且都包含我们认为有问题的多个项目。剔除不良项目的模特比完全裁剪的模特更合身。然而，即使在调整数据之后，模型拟合充其量也是微不足道的。在继续使用这两种测量方法时，应谨慎使用概念和心理测量方法。(C)2006爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
Despite the putative applicability and unquestioned heuristic value of capturing individual variation in behavioral inhibition (BIS) and approach system (BAS) sensitivities, the field has yet to achieve widespread agreement regarding a self-report instrument of choice. The current study evaluates perhaps the two strongest candidates, the BIS/BAS scales (Carver & White, 1994) and the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ; Torrubia, Avila, Molto, & Caseras, 2001). Using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analytic techniques in two university samples, we determined that neither measure achieved adequate fit to our data set, and both contain multiple items we deemed to be problematic. Models trimmed of the poor items achieved better fit than the full models. However, even after trimming the data, model fit was marginal at best. Caution is urged in the continued use of both measures on conceptual and psychometric grounds. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.