Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. 1993.
Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. 1993.
复制标题
建立定性研究的严谨性：决策轨迹。
作者：
T. Koch
本文的目的是展示定性研究过程的决策轨迹可以保持的方式。有人认为，如果读者能够审核研究人员的事件、影响和行为，则可以建立研究的可信度（严谨性）。实际的研究包含了这一决策的记录，旨在表达老年患者谁是入院的急症护理部门的担忧。1991年，这项研究在英国一家拥有1000张床位的国民健康服务医院的两个老年病房进行。最终，对14名患者进行了多次访谈，并以主题表达了他们的担忧，即：常规老年护理方式、去人格化、护理剥夺和老年隔离。我描述了在病人面谈开始之前所做的准备工作。文献记录的访谈者的经验过程作为数据在定性研究是稀缺的。我展示了作为存在现象学研究过程的一部分，研究者参与制作数据的过程。存在现象学依赖于记录影响，同时生成数据，如重要文献，媒体报道，我的价值立场和期刊数据。
The aim of this paper is to show the way in which the decision trail of a qualitative research process can be maintained. It is argued that the trustworthiness (rigour) of a study may be established if the reader is able to audit the events, influences and actions of the researcher. The actual study containing the recording of this decision trail aimed to express the concerns of older patients who were admitted to the acute care sector. The study took place in two care of the elderly wards in a 1000-bed National Health Service hospital in the UK, in 1991. Eventually, 14 patients were interviewed, each on several occasions, and their concerns are expressed in themes, namely: routine geriatric style of care, depersonalization, care deprivation and geriatric segregation. I describe the preparations that were undertaken before patient interviews could commence. The literature recording the process of the interviewer's experience as data in qualitative research is scarce. I show the researcher's participation in making the data as part of an existential phenomenological research process. Existential phenomenology relies on recording influences while generating data such as significant literature, media reports, my value position and journal data.