Rethinking the Dérive Drifting and theatricality in theatre and performance studies

Rethinking the Dérive Drifting and theatricality in theatre and performance studies
复制标题

重新思考戏剧和表演研究中的 Dérive Drifting 和戏剧性

DOI:
10.1080/13528165.2018.1557011
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
0.1
通讯作者:
Lavery C
Lavery C
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lavery C

文献摘要

相似文献

PR 23.7关于漂移。indd 1 23/01/2019 08:50在本版本中,driving在语法上是矛盾的,是“中间语态”的一个例子,其中“我们不开车,我们也不被开车”(见pp:140-1)。漂流是一种充满希望和恐惧、快乐和痛苦、可能性和危险的状态,不同的主体以不同的方式经历它。漂流本身就有某种模棱两可的东西,一种悬置和未定的关系,在这种关系中,能动性受到多重性的干扰,其中一些是暴力的胁迫,如无家可归或无国籍,而另一些则是政治上的解放,如能够逃离资本的世俗制度。[4]正如让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔(Jean-François Lyotard)所言,尽管他的观点基本上是积极的:漂流是复数形式的,因为问题不是离开一个海岸,而是同时离开几个海岸;起作用的不是一股电流,推和拉,而是不同的驱动力和牵引力......复数,奇点的集合,正是权力,资本(原文如此),价值法则,个人身份,身份证,责任,家人和医院都在竭力压制(1984(10)
PR 23.7 On Drifting. indd 1 23/01/2019 08: 50 this edition, drifting is grammatically ambivalent, an instance of the ‘middle voice’in which ‘we are not driving–and neither are we being driven’(see pp: 140–1). Drifting is a condition full of hope and terror, pleasure and pain, possibility and danger, and different subjects undergo it in different ways. There is something inherently equivocal about drifting, a suspensive and undecided relationship in which agency is perturbed by multiplicities, some of which are violently coercive, as in being made homeless or stateless, and others politically liberating, as in, say, being able to escape capital’s temporal regime. 4 As Jean-François Lyotard puts it, albeit from a largely positive perspective:Drift works in the plural, for the question is not of leaving one shore, but several simultaneously; what is at work is not one current, pushing and tugging, but different drives and tractions… The plural, the collection of singularities, are precisely what power, kapital (sic), the law of value, personal identity, the ID card, responsibility, the family and the hospital are bent on repressing.(1984: 10)