University Education and Deliberation: In Defence of Practical Reasoning

University Education and Deliberation: In Defence of Practical Reasoning
复制标题

大学教育与审议:捍卫实践推理

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Y. Waghid
Y. Waghid
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Y. Waghid

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在本文中,我认为在大学课堂中使用实践推理是必要的,以创造条件,使大学教师和学生能够超越主导的教育“传递模式”(教与学)。这种教育模式在几所(南非)大学的教室里曾经盛行,而且在许多情况下仍然盛行。我认为这对大学教师和学生在课堂实践中相互推理意味着什么。共同推理的核心思想是深思熟虑,它为教师和学生提供了体验“智能行动”的机会(Biesta 2004a),这可以增强在大学课堂内(以及课堂外)解决教育问题的能力。
In this article I argue that the use of practical reasoning in university classrooms is necessary to establish conditions under which university teachers and students can move beyond the dominant “transmission mode” of education (teaching and learning). This mode of education had been, and in many cases remains to be prevalent in several (South African) university classrooms. I argue what it could mean for university teachers and students to reason together with one another in classroom practices. Central to reasoning together is the idea of deliberation which provides opportunities for teachers and students to experience “intelligent action” (Biesta 2004a) that could enhance educational problem solving in (and beyond) university classrooms.