Eight criteria for practice-based research in the creative and cultural industries
Eight criteria for practice-based research in the creative and cultural industries
复制标题
创意文化产业实践研究的八项标准
DOI：
10.1386/adch.7.1.5_1
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Buchler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Biggs;D. Buchler
本文讨论了基于实践的研究中的两个核心问题：基本条件的识别，因此，实际例子的识别。这是批评的方法，在许多早期的案例研究，涉及循环论证。本文认为，创意文化产业的研究是一个学术研究的大领域，是一个积累的过程。从这一点上，它开发了一个基于标准的方法的必要条件。这样的研究，从而使识别的实际例子。这种方法解决了早期案例研究的循环问题。本文认为，该领域的学术研究有四个一般标准和四个学科标准。从这些标准的其他后果遵循的内容，以实践为基础的研究。作者目前正在使用这八个标准来识别和研究基于实践的案例。
This article addresses two core problems in practice-based research: the identification of fundamental conditions and, therefore, the identification of actual examples. It is critical of the methods in many earlier case studies involving circular argumentation. The article assumes that research in the creative and cultural industries is both situated in the largerfield of academic research and that it is a cumulative process. From this it develops a criterion-based approach to the necessary conditions.for such research, thereby enabling the identification of actual examples. This approach solves the circularity problem of earlier case studies. The article concludes that there are four generic and four discipline-specific criteria for academic research in the field. From these criteria other consequences follow for the content of practice-based research. These eight criteria are currently being used by the authors to identify and study cases of practice-based