Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Orange County, California, and support for early regional strategies to limit spread

Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Orange County, California, and support for early regional strategies to limit spread
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.004
复制
发表时间:
2017-11-01
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Huang, Susan S.
Huang, Susan S.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gohil, Shruti K.;Singh, Raveena;Huang, Susan S.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)的东向西传播为探索限制非流行地区传播的策略提供了机会。我们评估了CRE的出现和对遏制战略的区域支持。方法:2014年1月至9月,对加利福尼亚州奥兰治县(31家医院,服务300万居民)的感染预防项目进行了17个问题的横断面调查。问题涉及新发现的医院和社区发病的CRE培养(2008-2013年),当前的CRE控制策略,以及对假设区域干预的预防策略的支持。结果:31家医院中,有21家(68%)完成了调查,代表17个感染预防项目。2009-2010年间几乎没有检测到CRE;在4年内,90%的医院报告了CRE,社区发病比医院发病的CRE高2.5倍。2011年至2013年间,CRE的年发病率增加了4.7倍(1.4-6.3例/ 10000例)。对区域CRE预防包的支持是一致的。虽然22%的患者使用葡萄糖酸氯己定治疗CRE阳性,11%的患者积极筛查CRE,但分别有86%和57%的患者会在区域干预中考虑这些策略。结论:橙县的CRE流行病学与目前流行地区的早期进展相似,这是考虑干预措施以防止流行传播的机会。许多设施将考虑在区域合作的情况下采取积极主动的战略,例如氯己定洗浴。(C)感染控制与流行病学专业人员协会,2017;Elsevier Inc.出版。版权所有。
Background: The east-to-west spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) represents an opportunity to explore strategies to limit spread in nonendemic areas. We evaluated CRE emergence and regional support for containment strategies.Methods: A 17-question cross-sectional survey was administered to infection prevention programs in Orange County, CA (31 hospitals serving 3 million residents), between January and September 2014. Questions addressed newly detected hospital-and community-onset CRE cultures (2008-2013), current CRE control strategies, and support for prevention strategies for a hypothetical regional intervention.Results: Among 31 hospitals, 21 (68%, representing 17 infection prevention programs) completed the survey. CRE was scarcely detected between 2009-2010; within 4 years, 90% of hospitals reported CRE, with 2.5-fold higher community-onset than hospital-onset CRE. Between 2011 and 2013, annual CRE incidence increased 4.7-fold (1.4-6.3 cases/10,000 admissions). Support for a regional CRE prevention bundle was unanimous. Although 22% bathed patients positive for CRE with chlorhexidine gluconate and 11% actively screened for CRE, 86% and 57%, respectively, would consider these strategies in a regional intervention.Conclusions: CRE epidemiology in Orange County parallels early progression previously seen in now-endemic areas, representing an opportunity to consider interventions to prevent endemic spread. Many facilities would consider proactive strategies, such as chlorhexidine bathing, in the setting of a regional collaborative. (C) 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.