Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/jme.2007.021857
复制
发表时间:
2008-09-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Miller, F. G.
Miller, F. G.
中科院分区:
人文科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wertheimer, A.;Miller, F. G.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

支付研究参与费用引起了伦理问题,特别是关于其可能的胁迫。我们认为,定性支付研究参与胁迫是误导,因为提供的好处不能构成胁迫。在这篇文章中,我们分析了胁迫的概念,驳斥了胁迫的错误概念,并解释了为什么提供的研究参与的付款从来没有胁迫,但在某些情况下可能会产生不适当的诱导。
Payment for research participation has raised ethical concerns, especially with respect to its potential for coercion. We argue that characterising payment for research participation as coercive is misguided, because offers of benefit cannot constitute coercion. In this article we analyse the concept of coercion, refute mistaken conceptions of coercion and explain why the offer of payment for research participation is never coercive but in some cases may produce undue inducement.