Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives

Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
复制
发表时间:
2014-02-01
影响因子:
7.5
通讯作者:
Hu, Jinyu
Hu, Jinyu
中科院分区:
管理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dinh, Jessica E.;Lord, Robert G.;Hu, Jinyu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在过去的十年里,关于领导力的学术研究急剧增加,导致了各种领导理论的发展。为了评估新千年以来建立和发展的理论,我们对10个顶级学术出版机构的领导理论进行了广泛的定性审查,其中包括领导力季刊,行政科学季刊,美国心理学家,管理杂志,管理学院杂志,管理评论学院,应用心理学杂志,组织行为与人类决策过程、组织科学与人事心理学。然后,我们结合了两个现有的框架(Gardner,Lowe,Moss,Mahoney,& Cogliser,2010; Lord & Dinh,2012),提供了一个过程导向的框架,强调涌现形式和分析水平,作为整合不同领导理论的一种手段。然后,我们描述了未来的领导研究和理论的研究结果的影响。爱思唯尔公司出版
Scholarly research on the topic of leadership has witnessed a dramatic increase over the last decade, resulting in the development of diverse leadership theories. To take stock of established and developing theories since the beginning of the new millennium, we conducted an extensive qualitative review of leadership theory across 10 top-tier academic publishing outlets that included The Leadership Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Psychologist, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Organizational Science, and Personnel Psychology. We then combined two existing frameworks (Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney, & Cogliser, 2010; Lord & Dinh, 2012) to provide a process-oriented framework that emphasizes both forms of emergence and levels of analysis as a means to integrate diverse leadership theories. We then describe the implications of the findings for future leadership research and theory. Published by Elsevier Inc.