Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.
Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.
复制标题
接种疫苗还是解毒剂？
DOI：
10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Memon A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Memon A
这项研究检验了认知访谈（CI）是否可以抵消涉及强迫捏造的暗示性访谈的影响。大学生目睹了一个被拍摄的事件，随后被迫编造有关该事件的误导性问题的答案。在强制捏造阶段之前或之后，所有证人都接受了非主导 CI 或自由回忆 (FR) 采访。一周后，参与者完成了视频内容的识别和源监控（SM）测试。相对于 FR，在强制捏造面谈之前进行的 CI 增加了对正确细节的报告，并减少了对捏造项目的错误同意。 CI 后的错误记忆率与 FR 组相当。使用 CI 技术进行早期访谈可以防止记忆丧失和错误信息影响。
This study examined whether a cognitive interview (CI) can counteract the effects of suggestive interviews involving forced fabrication. College students witnessed a filmed event and were later forced to fabricate answers to misleading questions about the event. All witnesses were interviewed with a non-leading CI or free recall (FR) either before or after the forced fabrication phase. A week later participants completed a recognition and source monitoring (SM) test of video content. Relative to FR, the CI administered before the forced fabrication interview increased reports of correct details and reduced false assents to fabricated items. A CI after resulted in false memory rates comparable to the FR group. Early interviews using CI techniques may protect against memory loss and misinformation effects.