The birth of schizophrenia or a very modern Bleuler: a close reading of Eugen Bleuler’s ‘Die Prognose der Dementia praecox’ and a re-consideration of his contribution to psychiatry
The birth of schizophrenia or a very modern Bleuler: a close reading of Eugen Bleuler’s ‘Die Prognose der Dementia praecox’ and a re-consideration of his contribution to psychiatry
复制标题
精神分裂症或非常现代的布洛伊勒的诞生：仔细阅读尤金·布洛伊勒的《早发性痴呆的预测》以及重新思考他对精神病学的贡献
DOI：
10.1177/0957154x14546606
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
0.6
通讯作者：
P. Hoff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Maatz;P. Hoff
1908年尤金·布洛伊勒（Eugen Bleuler）提出“精神分裂症”后，该术语引起了激烈争论，但最终导致克雷佩林之前的术语“早发性痴呆”被放弃。布洛伊勒的贡献随后主要被解读为两种方式。一种传统认为，布洛勒只是将其重新命名为“早发性痴呆”，同时在概念上延续了克雷佩林式的传统。另一篇则侧重于布洛伊勒在特定心理变化方面对“早发性痴呆”的描述，认可他真正的重新概念化。基于对布洛伊勒首次提到“精神分裂症”的论文“Die Prognose der Dementia praecox”的仔细阅读，我们建议对布洛伊勒的贡献进行进一步解释，并认为他重新概念化的主要动机在于他对克雷佩林式疾病分类学的拒绝。
After Eugen Bleuler introduced ‘schizophrenia’ in 1908, the term was hotly debated but eventually led to the abandonment of Kraepelin’s previous term ‘dementia praecox’. Bleuler’s contribution has subsequently been interpreted in two main ways. One tradition holds that Bleuler merely renamed ‘dementia praecox’ while conceptually continuing the Kraepelinian tradition. The other, focusing on Bleuler’s characterization of ‘dementia praecox’ in terms of specific psychological alterations, accredits him with a genuine re-conceptualization. Based on a close reading of ‘Die Prognose der Dementia praecox’, the paper in which Bleuler first mentioned ‘schizophrenia’, we suggest a further interpretation of Bleuler’s contribution and argue that the main motive for his re-conceptualization is to be found in his rejection of Kraepelinian nosology.