Design and synthesis of Selenazole-containing peptides for cocrystallization with P-glycoprotein.
Design and synthesis of Selenazole-containing peptides for cocrystallization with P-glycoprotein.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/cbic.201100048
复制
发表时间:
2011-04-11
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zhang Q
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tao H;Weng Y;Zhuo R;Chang G;Urbatsch IL;Zhang Q
Over-expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) in some cancer cells is a primary cause of multidrug resistance (MDR) that results in chemotherapy failure. As a consequence, Pgp has been a long-sought target for drug development in the hope of circumventing MDR in clinical oncology.[1, 2] More than three decades of biochemical studies have indicated that Pgp might possess several distinct substrate-binding sites within a large, flexible region located between the two transmembrane domains; these sites recognize hundreds of chemically unrelated compounds, including a majority of traditional anti-cancer drugs.[3–6] These compounds can be exported from cells by Pgp using energy released by self-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis in conjunction with substantial conformational changes. Our groups recently determined a structure of mouse Pgp at 3.8 Å resolution by X-ray diffraction.[7] We also solved the cocrystal structures of Pgp with a pair of enantiomeric cyclic peptides, QZ59Se-RRR and QZ59Se-SSS (Scheme 1), in which the two enantiomers bind to Pgp with different stoichiometries and at distinct sites within a transmembrane portal open to the cytoplasmic side. These structures provided the first glimpse of the polyspecific drug-binding site of Pgp in atomic detail.Scheme 1 outlines our strategies for the design and synthesis of selenium (Se)-labeled cyclic peptides that were crucial to the successful cocrystallization with Pgp for X-ray structure determination. Our early attempts to cocrystallize Pgp with several well-studied modulators, including cyclosporin A [8, 9] and the cyclosporin derivative PSC 833 [10] were unsuccessful. Cyclosporin A and PSC 833 are both macrocyclic undecamer peptides the solution-phase conformations of which are flexible.[11, 12] We assume that this conformational flexibility