The Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey: A Demonstration of Amplified Public Good from Collaboration with Private Collectors
The Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey: A Demonstration of Amplified Public Good from Collaboration with Private Collectors
复制标题
俄亥俄州中部考古数字化调查：与私人收藏家合作扩大公共利益的示范
DOI：
10.1017/aap.2021.33
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Olson, Eric
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nolan, Kevin C.;Shott, Michael J.;Olson, Eric
考古记录的重要部分掌握在私人手中，包括负责和响应的管家（RRS）。这不一定是坏事。中央俄亥俄州考古数字化调查（COADS）从事中央俄亥俄州史前的合作研究RRS。COADS建设性地利用大量的RRS数据来增加区域考古记录的深度和广度。我们记录了来自32个RRS收藏品的12，000多个诊断点和大约5，000件其他石器。所有被扫描为二维（2D）图像，和一个样本作为三维（3D）模型的地标为基础的几何形态（LGM）分析和GIS分析史前土地利用。由此产生的数据集是俄亥俄州SHPO数据库中记录的该地区诊断数量的4.7倍，为数千年来的土地使用和工具使用提供了新的信息。除了学术研究，COADS还创建了一个可供RRS同事和整个社会使用的3D模型集合。这种互惠共享使专业人员和RRS社区互惠互利。专业人士并不是唯一研究文化过去的人;我们与RRS和其他合法利益的人合作得越多越好，我们对过去的共同理解就越好。
Significant parts of the archaeological record are in private hands, including those of responsible and responsive stewards (RRS). This is not necessarily a bad thing. The Central Ohio Archaeological Digitization Survey (COADS) engages RRS in collaborative study of central Ohio prehistory. COADS leverages the mass of RRS data constructively to add depth and breadth to a regional archaeological record. We recorded over 12,000 diagnostic points and about 5,000 other stone tools from 32 RRS collections. All were scanned as two-dimensional (2D) images, and a sample as three-dimensional (3D) models for landmark-based geometric morphometric (LGM) analysis and GIS analysis of prehistoric land use. The resulting dataset is >4.7 times the number of diagnostics recorded in the Ohio SHPO database for the region, shedding new light on land use and tool use over millennia. In addition to academic research, COADS creates an accessible collection of 3D models available to RRS colleagues and to society at large. This reciprocal sharing mutually benefits professionals and the RRS community. Professionals are not the only ones who research the cultural past; the more and better we collaborate with RRS and others with legitimate interests, the better our common understanding of that past.