Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views

Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/713755969
复制
发表时间:
2001-05
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
S. Tipper
S. Tipper
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Tipper

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

负启动在传统上被认为是注意力抑制机制的反映。然而,最近的研究表明,负启动并不反映抑制机制。相反,负启动试验的反应时间减慢是由于检索不兼容的反应标签或不匹配的感知信息,或者由于需要区分过去和现在的信息的额外过程。相反,它提出,没有确凿的证据来折扣抑制模型。事实上,虽然提取过程可能涉及负启动效应,理解这些需要考虑的抑制过程中涉及的选择信息的目标导向行为。
Negative priming has traditionally been viewed as a reflection of an inhibitory mechanism of attention. However, recent accounts have suggested that negative priming does not reflect inhibitory mechanisms. Rather, slowed reaction times on negative priming trials are either due to retrieval of incompatible response tags or of mismatching perceptual information, or due to extra processes needed to distinguish past from present information. In contrast, it is proposed that there is no firm evidence to discount inhibition models. In fact, although retrieval processes can be implicated in negative priming effects, understanding of these requires consideration of the inhibitory processes involved in selecting information for goal-directed behaviour.