Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses
Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses
复制标题
DOI：
10.1001/jama.276.16.1339
复制
发表时间：
1996-10-23
影响因子：
120.7
通讯作者：
Gold, MR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Siegel, JE;Weinstein, MC;Gold, MR
客观。-这篇文章是由三部分组成的系列文章中的第三篇，介绍了报告成本效益分析（CEA）的建议，旨在提高CEA报告的质量和可访问性。健康和医学成本效益小组，一个在CEA，临床医学，伦理学和健康结果测量方面具有专业知识的非联邦小组，由美国公共卫生服务部召集。专家组回顾了CEA的理论基础、当前实践、替代方法、已发表的对CEA的批评，以及对一般CEA方法和报告实践的批评。该小组通过两年半的讨论提出了建议。征求了联邦政府方法学家、卫生机构官员和学术方法学家对初稿的意见。提出这些建议的目的是提高研究方法的透明度，协助分析人员提供完整的信息，并便利介绍各项研究的可比成本效益结果。遵守报告惯例并注意提供理解和解释研究结果所需的信息将提高CEA的相关性和可及性。
Objective.-This article, the third in a 3-part series, describes recommendations for the reporting of cost-effective analyses (CEAs) intended to improve the quality and accessibility of CEA reports.Participants.-The Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, a nonfederal panel with expertise in CEA, clinical medicine, ethics, and health outcomes measurement, convened by the US Public Health Service.Evidence.-The panel reviewed the theoretical foundations of CEA, current practices, alternative methods, published critiques of CEAs, and criticisms of general CEA methods and reporting practices.Consensus Process.-The panel developed recommendations through 21/2 years of discussions. Comments on preliminary drafts were solicited from federal government methodologists, health agency officials, and academic methodologists.Conclusions.-These recommendations are proposed to enhance the transparency of study methods, assist analysts in providing complete information, and facilitate the presentation of comparable cost-effectiveness results across studies. Adherence to reporting conventions and attention to providing information required to understand and interpret study results will improve the relevance and accessibility of CEAs.