Introduction: The Debate on Design Review

Introduction: The Debate on Design Review
复制标题

引言:关于设计审查的争论

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Scheer
B. Scheer
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Scheer

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

设计审查是一个程序,就像分区一样,城镇用来控制开发项目的美学和设计。虽然这是一个新现象,但与20世纪30年代分区的迅速采用相比,地方司法管辖区采用它的速度正在增长。我最近完成了对370多个城镇规划机构的全国调查,调查主题是设计审查流程;83%的受访城镇进行了某种形式的设计审查。事实证明,我最初的假设--审美审查主要限于历史街区和建筑--是错误的。只有12名受访者保留了专门针对历史建筑或街区的设计审查。因此,可以说,全国85%以上的城镇已经进入了普通、非历史开发项目的设计审查领域。这种对设计评审的广泛使用也是新的:60%的接受设计评审的受访者在过去12年中引入了设计评审,10%的受访者在过去两年中引入了设计评审。
Design review is a procedure, like zoning, used by cities and towns to control the aesthetics and design of development projects. Although it is a new phenomena, its adoption by local jurisdictions is growing at a rate that compares to the rapid adoption of zoning in the 1930s. I have recently completed a national survey of planning agencies in more than 370 cities and towns on the topic of their design review processes; 83 percent of the towns surveyed had some form of design review. My initial assumption—that aesthetic review was primarily restricted to historic districts and structures—proved to be wrong. Only twelve respondents reserved design review exclusively for historic structures or districts. Therefore, we can conclude that more than 85 percent of the cities and towns in this country have moved into the arena of design review of ordinary, nonhistoric development projects. This widespread use of design review is also new: 60 percent of the respondents with design review have introduced it in the last twelve years, 10 percent in the last two years.