Development and validation of QoL5 for clinical databases. A short, global and generic questionnaire based on an integrated theory of the quality of life
Development and validation of QoL5 for clinical databases. A short, global and generic questionnaire based on an integrated theory of the quality of life
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/11024150252884331
复制
发表时间：
2002-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Henneberg, EW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lindholt, JS;Ventegodt, S;Henneberg, EW
目的：开发和验证一个短。临床数据库的全球和通用生活质量（QoL）问卷。现有问卷的结构效度和项目权重受到越来越多的质疑。设计：横断面人口研究。对象：2460名年龄在18-88岁之间的丹麦人，通过丹麦中央人口登记处随机选择。干预措施：十个问题，涵盖生活质量综合理论与诺丁汉健康概况（NHP）的范围。邮寄疾病影响量表（SIP）和自评生活质量问卷。一个月后，对50人进行了再测试研究。主要结果测量：结构和效度。可靠性和灵敏度。结果：QoL5与SIP呈正相关。额定马力。自我估计的生活质量分别为0.37、0.52和0.76。在身体不适的人群中增加。Cronbach's alpha为0.69。Siegel检验的相关系数均大于0.6，重测相关系数为0.82。每组中只需要12名应答者就可以发现两组之间生活质量评分的10%差异。结论：QoL5是一种有效的全局和通用的QoL测量方法。尽管只用了五个问题。内部一致性和灵敏度均可接受。因此，一个相关的和实际的结果测量是可用的临床数据库。
Objective: To develop and validate a short. global, and generic quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for clinical databases. The construct validity and item weighting of existing questionnaires are increasingly questioned.Design: Cross-sectional population study.Subject: 2460 Danes aged 18-88 years, randomly selected through the Danish Central Person Registry.Interventions: Ten question, covering the spectrum of the integrative theory of QoL together with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and self-estimated QoL questionnaire were sent by mail. A test-retest study of 50 people was conducted after one month.Main outcome measures: Construct and criterion validity. reliability, and sensitivity.Results: QoL5 correlations with SIP. NHP. Self-estimated QoL were 0.37, 0.52, and 0.76, respectively. and increased among those who were unwell. Cronbach's alpha was 0.69. All correlations in Siegel's test were over 0.6, and the test-retest correlation was 0.82. Only 12 respondents in each group will be needed to detect a difference of 10% in the QoL score between two groups.Conclusions: QoL5 is a valid global and generic QoL measurement. Despite the use of only five questions. internal consistency and sensitivity were acceptable. So a relevant and practical outcome measurement is available for clinical databases.