Correlation of Side Impact Dummy/Cadaver Tests
Correlation of Side Impact Dummy/Cadaver Tests
复制标题
侧面碰撞假人/尸体测试的相关性
DOI：
10.4271/811008
复制
发表时间：
1981
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Eppinger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Morgan;J. H. Marcus;R. Eppinger
本文是一项为期四年的研究的一部分，系统地定义侧面碰撞损伤的动力学响应的一个合适的拟人假人。去年，在德国的实验安全车辆会议上发表了一篇论文，该论文分析了侧面碰撞假人的反应和基于公路安全研究所生成的尸体数据的伤害预测。这些主题一般比本文讨论的主题更早。本文包括来自海德堡大学尸体雪橇试验的数据-包括我们最近发现的（1）对确定性分析至关重要的（2）以前不可用的衬垫试验。两个先进的假人，其设计规格是基于生物力学数据，目前正在评估的生物力学界。这两个假人是（1）由高速公路安全研究所（HSRI）设计的侧面碰撞假人（SID）和（2）来自法国的标致-雷诺协会（APR）假人。这两个候选假人设计的性能进行了比较，通过各种技术在七个相同的测试，使用尸体。选择这些测试用于评估生物逼真度、可重复性和假人/衬垫相互作用。在这些技术中，有一个累积方差分析-类似于均方根分析-七个独特的雪橇/摆锤试验的加速度信号，其中存在APR假人、SID和尸体的加速度响应数据。这种累积方差方法允许客观比较每个假人设计相对于尸体数据的响应。
This paper is part of a four year study to systematically define side impact injury in terms of the kinetic response of a suitable anthropomorphic dummy. Last year a paper was presented at the Experimental Safety Vehicle Conference in Germany which analyzed side impact dummy response and injury prediction based on cadaver data generated by the Highway Safety Research Institute. These subjects were generally older than those discussed in the current paper. This paper includes data from a number of University of Heidelberg cadaver sled tests-- including padding tests which we recently found to be (1) critical for a definitive analysis and (2) previously not available. Two advanced dummies, whose design specifications are based upon biomechanical data, are currently being evaluated by the biomechanical community. The two dummies are (1) a Side Impact Dummy (SID) designed by the Highway Safety Research Institute (HSRI) and (2) the Association Peugeot-Renault (APR) dummy from France. The performance of these two candidate dummy designs is compared by a variety of techniques in seven identical tests using cadavers. These tests are chosen for use in evaluating biofidelity, repeatability, and dummy/ padding interaction. Among these techniques is a cumulative variance analysis--similar to a root-mean-square analysis-- of the acceleration signal for the seven unique sled/pendulum tests where acceleration response data exists for APR dummy, SID, and cadavers. This cumulative variance approach allows an objective comparison of the response of each dummy design with respect to the cadaver data.