The Right to Seek – Revisited. On the UN Human Rights Declaration Article 14 and Access to Asylum Procedures in the EU

The Right to Seek – Revisited. On the UN Human Rights Declaration Article 14 and Access to Asylum Procedures in the EU
复制标题

寻求权利——重新审视联合国人权宣言第 14 条和欧盟的庇护程序

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hans Gammeltoft
Hans Gammeltoft
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Gammeltoft‐Hansen;Hans Gammeltoft

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这篇文章将《世界人权宣言》第14条所载的“寻求和享受庇护的权利”与欧盟目前的政策发展进行了比较,以“外部化”或“域外化”移民控制和难民保护。在《世界人权宣言》谈判期间审查第14条的起源时,有人认为,虽然第14条显然福尔斯没有给予获得庇护的实质性权利,但其措辞的目的是维护一项程序性权利-获得庇护程序的权利。虽然《世界人权宣言》不是一项具有法律约束力的文书,但回顾其中所表达的基本准则,仍然是评估现行政策的一个重要起点,特别是鉴于最近有人批评对人权法的解释过于宽泛。因此,文章的结论是,欧盟目前的政策,转移移民控制和难民保护远离欧洲在重要方面违反了“寻求庇护的权利”,因为它是在60年前设想的。
Th is article compares the “right to seek and enjoy asylum” enshrined in Art. 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with the current EU policy developments to “externalize” or “extraterritorialise” migration control and refugee protection. Examining the genesis of Art. 14 during the negotiations of the Universal Declaration, it is argued that while Art. 14 clearly falls short of granting a substantive right to be granted asylum, its formulation was intended to maintain a procedural right – the right to an asylum process. While the Universal Declaration is not a legally binding instrument, going back to the fundamental norms expressed herein nonetheless provides an important starting point for evaluating current policies, especially in light of recent critiques against overly expansive interpretation of human rights law. As such, the article concludes that the current EU policies to shift migration control and refugee protection away from Europe in important respects contravenes “the right to seek asylum” as it was conceived exactly 60 years ago.