Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action

Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action
复制标题

DOI:
10.3758/app.72.3.706
复制
发表时间:
2010-04-01
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Davids, Keith
Davids, Keith
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dicks, Matt;Button, Chris;Davids, Keith

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在两种视频模拟条件下(即,言语和操纵杆运动响应)和三种原位条件(即,言语、简化的身体运动和拦截反应)。结果表明,对于所有涉及有限运动的知觉判断条件(即,言语反应、操纵杆运动和简化的身体运动)。相比之下,在原位拦截条件下,守门员花了同样多的时间来关注罚球队员的相对运动和球的位置,这需要守门员尝试进行点球扑救。这些数据表明,凝视和运动行为的功能不同,这取决于实验任务的限制选择的实证调查。这些研究结果强调,需要进行知觉运动行为的研究,在有代表性的实验条件下,允许适当的概括的结论,性能环境。
Gaze and movement behaviors of association football goalkeepers were compared under two video simulation conditions (i.e., verbal and joystick movement responses) and three in situ conditions (i.e., verbal, simplified body movement, and interceptive response). The results showed that the goalkeepers spent more time fixating on information from the penalty kick taker's movements than ball location for all perceptual judgment conditions involving limited movement (i.e., verbal responses, joystick movement, and simplified body movement). In contrast, an equivalent amount of time was spent fixating on the penalty taker's relative motions and the ball location for the in situ interception condition, which required the goalkeepers to attempt to make penalty saves. The data suggest that gaze and movement behaviors function differently, depending on the experimental task constraints selected for empirical investigations. These findings highlight the need for research on perceptual motor behaviors to be conducted in representative experimental conditions to allow appropriate generalization of conclusions to performance environments.