The Effect of Digital Versus Traditional Orchestration on Collaboration in Small Groups
The Effect of Digital Versus Traditional Orchestration on Collaboration in Small Groups
复制标题
数字与传统编排对小组协作的影响
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_69
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Jon Wetzel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. VanLehn;H. Burkhardt;Salman Cheema;Seokmin Kang;D. Pead;A. Schoenfeld;Jon Wetzel
我们正在开发一个名为FACT（使用计算技术的形成性评估）的智能编排系统。示范是指教师管理的一个面对面的课堂工作流程，混合小组，个人和整个班级的活动。FACT由非智能媒体系统和智能分析系统组成。虽然分析系统仍在改进中，旨在增加协作，但先前的工作表明，媒体系统可能会损害协作。因此，我们进行了评估的事实媒体系统在教室里，比较它与传统的教室。我们对小团体的视频进行编码，以衡量他们的合作。FACT媒体系统没有造成任何伤害：FACT教室中协作代码的分布在统计上与传统教室中的分布相似。这个空结果是一个好消息，为测试分析系统的好处奠定了基础。
We are developing an intelligent orchestration system named FACT (Formative Assessment using Computational Technology). Orchestration refers the teacher’s management of a face-to-face classroom workflow that mixes small group, individual and whole class activities. FACT is composed of an unintelligent Media system and an intelligent Analysis system. Although the Analysis system, which is still being refined, is designed to increase collaboration, prior work suggests that the Media system could possibly harm collaboration. Thus, we conducted an evaluation of the FACT Media system in classrooms, comparing it against traditional classrooms. We coded videos of small groups in order to measure their collaboration. The FACT Media system did no harm: the distribution of collaboration codes in FACT classrooms is statistically similar to the distribution in traditional classrooms. This null result is welcome news and sets the stage for testing the benefits of the Analysis system.