Safety of maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in individuals with sickle cell disease: a systematic review.
Safety of maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in individuals with sickle cell disease: a systematic review.
复制标题
镰状细胞病患者最大心肺运动试验的安全性:一项系统性综述。
DOI:
10.1136/bjsports-2021-104450
复制
发表时间:
2022-07
影响因子:
18.4
通讯作者:
Liem RI
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Smith KN;Baynard T;Fischbach PS;Hankins JS;Hsu LL;Murphy PM;Ness KK;Radom-Aizik S;Tang A;Liem RI
We evaluated the safety of maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Maximal CPET using gas exchange analysis is the gold standard for measuring cardiopulmonary fitness in the laboratory, yet its safety in the SCD population is unclear. Systematic review. Systematic search of Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and professional society websites for all published studies and abstracts through December 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted data of interest from studies that assessed safety outcomes of maximal CPET in children and adults with SCD. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess for risk of bias in studies included. In total, 24 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Adverse events were reported separately or as part of study results in 36/939 (3.8%) of participants with SCD undergoing maximal CPET in studies included. Most adverse events were related to transient ischemic changes on electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring or oxygen desaturation during testing that did not result in arrhythmias or other complications. Only 4/939 (0.43%) participants experienced pain events due to maximal CPET. Maximal CPET appears to be a safe testing modality in children and adults with SCD and can be used to better understand the physiologic basis of reduced exercise capacity as well as guide exercise prescription in this population. Some studies did not focus on reporting adverse events related to exercise testing or failed to mention safety monitoring, which contributed to risk of bias.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9.6
作者:
Chaudry, Rifat A.;Bush, Andrew;Crowley, Suzanne
通讯作者:
Crowley, Suzanne
影响因子:
6.5
作者:
Liem, Robert I.;Onyejekwe, Kasiemobi;Thompson, Alexis A.
通讯作者:
Thompson, Alexis A.
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Blair, SN;Kampert, JB;Gibbons, LW
通讯作者:
Gibbons, LW
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Badawy SM;Payne AB;Rodeghier MJ;Liem RI
通讯作者:
Liem RI
DOI:
10.1164/rccm.2002036
发表时间:
2002-05-01
影响因子:
24.7
作者:
Callahan, LA;Woods, KF;Gutin, B
通讯作者:
Gutin, B