A CIRCUMPLEX MODEL OF AFFECT
A CIRCUMPLEX MODEL OF AFFECT
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0077714
复制
发表时间：
1980-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
RUSSELL, JA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
RUSSELL, JA
因素分析的证据使大多数心理学家将情感描述为一组维度，如不愉快、痛苦、抑郁、兴奋等，每个维度都独立于其他维度而变化。然而，还有其他证据表明，这些情感维度不是独立的，而是以高度系统化的方式相互关联的。证据表明，这些相互关系可以用一个空间模型来表示，在这个模型中，情感概念按以下顺序落在一个圆圈中：快乐（0），兴奋（45），唤醒（90），痛苦（135），不快（180），抑郁（225），困倦（270）和放松（315）。这个模型既可以作为心理学家通过自我报告评估情感体验结构的一种方式，也可以作为外行人在概念化情感时使用的认知结构的一种表示。支持性证据是通过4种不同的方法对28个表示情感的形容词进行测量而获得的：RT Ross（1938）的变量循环排序技术，基于术语之间感知相似性的多维测量程序，假设的快乐-不快乐和唤醒程度维度的一维测量，以及对343名学生自我报告当前情感状态的主成分分析。(70参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Factor-analytic evidence has led most psychologists to describe affect as a set of dimensions, such as displeasure, distress, depression, excitement, and so on, with each dimension varying independently of the others. However, there is other evidence that rather than being independent, these affective dimensions are interrelated in a highly systematic fashion. The evidence suggests that these interrelationships can be represented by a spatial model in which affective concepts fall in a circle in the following order: pleasure (0), excitement (45), arousal (90), distress (135), displeasure (180), depression (225), sleepiness (270), and relaxation (315). This model was offered both as a way psychologists can represent the structure of affective experience, as assessed through self-report, and as a representation of the cognitive structure that laymen utilize in conceptualizing affect. Supportive evidence was obtained by scaling 28 emotion-denoting adjectives in 4 different ways: RT Ross's (1938) technique for a circular ordering of variables, a multidimensional scaling procedure based on perceived similarity among the terms, a unidimensional scaling on hypothesized pleasure–displeasure and degree-of-arousal dimensions, and a principal-components analysis of 343 Ss' self-reports of their current affective states.(70 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)