Understanding Minds in Real-World Environments: Toward a Mobile Cognition Approach.
Understanding Minds in Real-World Environments: Toward a Mobile Cognition Approach.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00694
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Ietswaart M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ladouce S;Donaldson DI;Dudchenko PA;Ietswaart M
越来越多的证据表明，人类认知的重要方面已经被传统认知科学边缘化或忽视。特别是，使用基于实验室的实验，其中刺激是人为的，反应选项是固定的，不可避免地会导致与现实世界行为相关的生态学有效性较低的结果。在目前的审查中，我们强调了一系列新的移动的技术，使传统的实验室约束的测量，现在收集与世界的自然互动过程中提供的机会。我们开始概述的理论支持，移动的方法从认知的发展体现帐户，我们审查扩大的证据，说明了在他们的背景下检查认知过程的重要性。正如我们所承认的，在实践中，移动的方法的发展带来了新的挑战，无疑需要在范式设计和分析方面进行创新。然而，如果成功的话，移动的认知方法将在一系列领域提供新的见解，包括理解空间导航的认知过程以及注意力在自然行为中的作用。我们认为，现实世界的移动的认知的发展提供了增加的生态有效性，并有机会检查感知，认知和行动之间的相互作用，而不是孤立地检查每一个。
There is a growing body of evidence that important aspects of human cognition have been marginalized, or overlooked, by traditional cognitive science. In particular, the use of laboratory-based experiments in which stimuli are artificial, and response options are fixed, inevitably results in findings that are less ecologically valid in relation to real-world behavior. In the present review we highlight the opportunities provided by a range of new mobile technologies that allow traditionally lab-bound measurements to now be collected during natural interactions with the world. We begin by outlining the theoretical support that mobile approaches receive from the development of embodied accounts of cognition, and we review the widening evidence that illustrates the importance of examining cognitive processes in their context. As we acknowledge, in practice, the development of mobile approaches brings with it fresh challenges, and will undoubtedly require innovation in paradigm design and analysis. If successful, however, the mobile cognition approach will offer novel insights in a range of areas, including understanding the cognitive processes underlying navigation through space and the role of attention during natural behavior. We argue that the development of real-world mobile cognition offers both increased ecological validity, and the opportunity to examine the interactions between perception, cognition and action—rather than examining each in isolation.