Sorption and diffusion of benzene in HZSM-5 and silicalite crystals
Sorption and diffusion of benzene in HZSM-5 and silicalite crystals
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/aic.690341016
复制
发表时间:
1988-10
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
D. B. Shah;D. Hayhurst;G. Evanina;Chang-Jie Guo
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. B. Shah;D. Hayhurst;G. Evanina;Chang-Jie Guo
The discovery of intermediate-pore zeolites such as ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 based on the ten-membered oxygen rings prompted considerable increase in the use of zeolites in many novel separative, adsorptive and shape-selective catalytic processes. ZSM-5 has the same pore size as many of the commercially important aromatics and substituted paraffinic molecules. A wide range of adsorptive and catalytic applications of ZSM-5 has been proposed based on the size and configuration of diffusing molecules. Few studies, however, have been reported on intrinsic sorption and diffusion of aromatics and substituted parafins in this zeolite.The adsorption equilibria of aromatic hydrocarbons on ZSM-5 and its aluminum-deficient structural analog silicalite have been measured by Jacobs et al.(I 98 I), Stach et al.(1 986), and Pope (1984, 1986). Adsorption of benzene on ZSM-5 has been investigated by Doelle et al.(1981) and by Choudhary and Srinivasan (1 987a). Adsorption and diffusion of C6-C, aromatics in silicalite from the gas phase have been reported by Wu et al.(1983) and for ZSM-5 in liquid phase by Choudhary and Singh (1986). Choudhary and Srinivasan (1987b, c) have measured diffusion of benzene in HZSM-5 under catalytic conditions using a dynamic sorption/desorption technique. When the sorption and diffusion data from above sources are analyzed, the data on sorption capacity are found to be consistent. For example, the limiting sorption capacity of ZSM-5 for benzene is found to be 0.1 to 0.12 kg/kg. For diffusion, however, the reported data do not show the same consistency. For example, the values of corrected diffusivities, Do, for a cyclic hydrocarbon such as benzene have been found to vary over two to three orders of magnitude [S x m2/s as reported by Wu et al.(1983) at 373 K vs. 5 x reported by Zikanova et al.(1987) at 393 K]. Olsonetal.(1981) reportedavalueof 10-" at 588 K, whereas Choudhary and Srinivasan (1987b) report val-