Effects of a lifestyle intervention on body composition in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy.

Effects of a lifestyle intervention on body composition in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy.
复制标题

生活方式干预对前列腺癌患者身体成分的影响对雄激素剥夺治疗。

DOI:
10.1002/crt2.13
复制
发表时间:
2020-04
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

运动和饮食(EX+D)干预可能是减轻或逆转前列腺癌(PCa)患者雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)不良反应的最佳治疗方法。个体化饮食和运动依从性先导(IDEA-P)试验比较了EX+D干预相对于标准治疗(SC)在接受ADT的PCa患者中的效果。本研究评价了EX+D干预对IDEA-P患者子样本中通过双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)获得的身体成分(BC)的影响。次要目的是探讨肥胖和瘦体重与运动能力和力量的关系。在基线和3个月随访时,从22例PCa患者(EX+D:n = 13; SC:n = 9)的子样本中获得完整的DXA数据。意向治疗分析包括30名参与者(M年龄= 66.28; SD = 7.79)的基线DXA评估数据。意向治疗分析显示EX+D导致脂肪量的显著改善(P = 0.022),脂肪量百分比(P = 0.028),躯干脂肪量(P = 0.017),脂肪量/瘦体重EX+D组与SC组相比,瘦体重百分比(P = 0.026)也导致了更有利的瘦体重/体重变化(d = 0.59)。在3个月随访时,选择BC结果也与移动性能和力量显著相关(P < 0.05)。研究结果表明,EX+D干预导致相对于SC治疗的瘦肉组织的上级保存和肥胖的改善。结果强调了在接受ADT的PCa患者中实施EX+D干预以保留肌肉质量和减少肥胖的效用。
Exercise and dietary (EX+D) interventions could represent an optimal treatment for attenuating or reversing adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The Individualized Diet and Exercise Adherence-Pilot (IDEA-P) trial compared the effects of an EX+D intervention relative to standard-of-care (SC) treatment among PCa patients undergoing ADT. The present study evaluated the effects of the EX+D intervention on body composition (BC) obtained via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a subsample of IDEA-P patients. A secondary objective was to explore the association of adiposity and lean mass with mobility performance and strength. Complete DXA data were acquired from a subsample of 22 PCa patients (EX+D: n = 13; SC: n = 9) at baseline and 3 month follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis included data from 30 participants (M age = 66.28; SD = 7.79) with baseline DXA assessments. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed EX+D resulted in significant improvements in fat mass (P = 0.022), per cent fat mass (P = 0.028), trunk fat mass (P = 0.017), fat mass/lean mass (P = 0.040), and per cent lean mass (P = 0.026) vs. SC. EX+D also resulted in more favourable changes in appendicular lean mass/body mass (d = 0.59). Select BC outcomes were also significantly correlated with mobility performance and strength (P < 0.05) at 3 month follow-up. Findings suggest the EX+D intervention resulted in superior preservation of lean tissue and improvement in adiposity relative to SC treatment. Results underscore the utility of implementing EX+D interventions for preserving muscle mass and reducing adiposity in PCa patients undergoing ADT.