Comparison of HPLC with electrochemical detection and LC-MS/MS for the separation and validation of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in animal and human plasma

Comparison of HPLC with electrochemical detection and LC-MS/MS for the separation and validation of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in animal and human plasma
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.04.019
复制
发表时间:
2008-05-15
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Weina, Peter
Weina, Peter
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gu, Yuanchao;Li, Qigui;Weina, Peter

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

高效液相色谱还原电化学检测(HPLC-ECD)方法自1985年开始用于青蒿素的测定。虽然该方法已得到显着改进,但具有显着优势的串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)系统已逐渐取代HPLC-ECD来分析血浆中的青蒿琥酯和双氢青蒿素。在本研究中,评估了两种方法的线性、定量限、选择性、精密度和准确度。 HPLC-ECD 在各种验证参数方面表现良好,并且在血浆中校准时与 LC-MS/MS 表现出良好的一致性。然而,LC-MS/MS 的主要优点是它只需要 HPLC-ECD 检测所需血浆体积的十分之一。由 Elsevier B.V. 出版
High-performance liquid chromatography with reductive electrochemical detection (HPLC-ECD) method has been used for assaying artemisinins since 1985. Although the methods have been remarkably improved, tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) systems with significant advantages have gradually replaced HPLC-ECD to analyze artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in plasma. In the present study, the two methods were evaluated for linearity, quantitation limits, selectivity, precision, and accuracy. The HPLC-ECD performed well in terms of various validation parameters, and showed a good agreement with the LC-MS/MS when calibrated in plasma. However, the major benefit of LC-MS/MS is that it requires only one-tenth the plasma volume needed by HPLC-ECD assay. Published by Elsevier B.V.