Necessity of minimum floor area ratio regulation: a second-best policy

Necessity of minimum floor area ratio regulation: a second-best policy
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00168-008-0269-0
复制
发表时间:
2010-06
期刊:
The Annals of Regional Science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tatsuhito Kono;Takayuki Kaneko;H. Morisugi
Tatsuhito Kono;Takayuki Kaneko;H. Morisugi
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tatsuhito Kono;Takayuki Kaneko;H. Morisugi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了在人口密度产生负外部性的情况下,在何处以及如何实施容积率(FAR)法规,例如,交通拥挤和噪音,使用一个简单的静态封闭城市模型。结果表明,FAR法规是第二好的政策,有必要为“minimumFAR法规”,除了目前使用的“maximumFAR法规”。因此,在实际的城市规划中,仅强制实施最大FAR法规是一种常见的做法,得出结论认为,对于一个封闭的城市来说是不够的。
This article examines where and how to impose floor area ratio (FAR) regulations in the presence of negative externalities engendered in population density, e.g., traffic congestion and noise, using a simple static closed city model. Results indicate that FAR regulation is the second-best policy and that there is a need for “minimumFAR regulations,” in addition to the currently used “maximumFAR regulations.” Thus, the imposition of onlymaximumFAR regulations, a practice common in actual city planning, is concluded to be insufficient for a closed city.