Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and Wind systems: Four representative European cases
Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and Wind systems: Four representative European cases
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.solener.2008.08.001
复制
发表时间：
2009-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Zizzo, G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Campoccia, A.;Dusonchet, L.;Zizzo, G.
2007年3月9日，欧洲理事会确定了到2020年可再生能源发电量占欧洲总发电量20%的目标。为了实现这一宏伟目标，欧洲各国都采取了不同的支持政策来鼓励可再生能源发电系统的安装。在简要回顾了欧洲可再生能源的主要支持政策后，（法国、德国、意大利和西班牙）进行了审查，目的是证明光伏（PV）和风能系统所采用的支持政策的主要差异。基于投资回收期（PBP）计算的比较。净现值（NPV）和内部收益率（IRR），对于不同规模的光伏和风能系统，表明在某些情况下，支持政策可能对基于可再生能源的发电系统的所有者不方便，并且在许多情况下，不同国家实施相同支持政策的方式之间的差异可能导致显著不同的结果。(c)2008爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
In the 9th of March 2007, the European Council decided a fixing goal of 20% contribution of the renewable energy sources (RES) on the total European electric energy production in 2020.In order to reach such ail ambitious goal, all the European countries are adopting different support policies for encouraging the installations of RES-based generation systems.In this paper, after a brief review on the main support policies for RES in Europe, the specific situations of four representative countries (France, Germany, Italy and Spain) are examined, with the purpose of putting into evidence the main differences in the support policies adopted for Photovoltaic (PV) and Wind systems.In particular, a comparison based on the calculation of the pay-back-period (PBP). the net present value (NPV) and the internal rate of return (IRR), for different sized PV and Wind systems, shows that in some situations a support policy can be not convenient for the owner of the RES-based generation system and that, in many cases, the differences between the way of implementation of the same support policy in different countries, can give place to significantly different results. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.