National movement patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand: the unexplored role of neighbourhood deprivation.
National movement patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand: the unexplored role of neighbourhood deprivation.
复制标题
新西兰2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的全国人口流动模式：邻里剥夺未探明的作用
DOI：
10.1136/jech-2020-216108
复制
发表时间：
2021-09
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
Kingham S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Campbell M;Marek L;Wiki J;Hobbs M;Sabel CE;McCarthy J;Kingham S
2019冠状病毒病大流行给世界各国政府提出了前所未有的问题。政策反应扰乱了当地和全球社会通常的流动模式，从而对国民经济和人类福祉产生影响。这些干预措施主要集中在实施封锁和提出保持社会距离的建议，导致对机构和国家行政机构作用的信任和能力产生问题。这项研究表明，在国家“封锁”期间，人口流动的不平等社会影响。我们使用全国移动电话移动数据，使用生态研究设计来量化强制封锁对社区剥夺对人口流动的影响。然后，我们使用新西兰每个社区（2253个人口普查统计区；平均人口n=2086）的全国每小时移动电话位置数据（745万条记录，2020年3月1日至2020年7月20日）的匿名汇总人口计数得出流动性指数。限制流动凸显并加剧了潜在的社会和空间不平等。我们的分析揭示了新西兰社区社会经济地位在“封锁”期间的不平等运动。在理解邻里运动中的不平等现象时，我们正在为引发此类争议的国家、区域或地方封锁的影响和效力的政策辩论提供重要的新证据。
The COVID-19 pandemic has asked unprecedented questions of governments around the world. Policy responses have disrupted usual patterns of movement in society, locally and globally, with resultant impacts on national economies and human well-being. These interventions have primarily centred on enforcing lockdowns and introducing social distancing recommendations, leading to questions of trust and competency around the role of institutions and the administrative apparatus of state. This study demonstrates the unequal societal impacts in population movement during a national ‘lockdown’. We use nationwide mobile phone movement data to quantify the effect of an enforced lockdown on population mobility by neighbourhood deprivation using an ecological study design. We then derive a mobility index using anonymised aggregated population counts for each neighbourhood (2253 Census Statistical Areas; mean population n=2086) of national hourly mobile phone location data (7.45 million records, 1 March 2020–20 July 2020) for New Zealand (NZ). Curtailing movement has highlighted and exacerbated underlying social and spatial inequalities. Our analysis reveals the unequal movements during ‘lockdown’ by neighbourhood socioeconomic status in NZ. In understanding inequalities in neighbourhood movements, we are contributing critical new evidence to the policy debate about the impact(s) and efficacy of national, regional or local lockdowns which have sparked such controversy.
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Marmot M;Allen J
通讯作者：
Allen J
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
McCartney G;Leyland A;Walsh D;Ruth D
通讯作者：
Ruth D
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Bambra, Clare;Riordan, Ryan;Matthews, Fiona
通讯作者：
Matthews, Fiona