Role Inversion: The Curator Takes the Stage
Role Inversion: The Curator Takes the Stage
复制标题
角色倒置:策展人走上舞台
DOI:
10.1162/pajj_a_00176
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Ferdman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Ferdman
PAJ 106 (2014), pp. 53–58. 53 doi:10.1162/PAJJ _a_00176 Given the rise of the international festival circuit in contemporary performance practice, and artists’ dependence for their livelihood on their work getting seen and produced at such festivals, it is no surprise that the role of the performing arts curator — otherwise also known as programmer, presenter, artistic director, or producer — has become a central and powerful figure, both in determining what gets seen and who gets paid. As we learned from the French sociologist and philosopher Pierre Bourdieu, art and taste do not work in a vacuum: art’s value is intrinsically tied to its mediation. By introducing the field to the concept of cultural production (which itself works inside the field power), as well as the concept of cultural and symbolic capital, Bourdieu demonstrated how aesthetic reception is inseparable from the production, marketing, and circulation of the artwork. So we can think of the performing arts curator as one of a slew of cultural producers who legitimizes and therefore plays a central role not only in disseminating performance, but also in determining its value. And because symbolic capital (good critique, an award, the festival circuit) in the cultural field will eventually translate into economic profit (more bookings, commissions, residencies, lectures, and workshops), we can think of the performing arts curator as a mediator between such transfers of capital. As with most experimental art forms, contemporary performance operates within this system, one that it actively seeks to deny (art-for-profit), and thus continually exists by pretending not to be doing what it is doing. Or in Bourdieu’s own words: “economic interests always haunt the most disinterested parties.”