Response letter to “Bleeding-related outcomes of low-risk total placenta previa are equivalent to those of partial/marginal placenta previa”
Response letter to “Bleeding-related outcomes of low-risk total placenta previa are equivalent to those of partial/marginal placenta previa”
复制标题
对“低风险完全性前置胎盘的出血相关结果与部分/边缘性前置胎盘的出血相关结果相同”的回复信
DOI:
10.1016/j.tjog.2022.08.011
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Takahashi Hironori
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ogoyama Manabu;Takahashi Hironori
We would like to thank Yao et al. for their interesting comments on the issue of placenta accreta spectrum [[1],[2],[3]]. Difficulties are associated with the diagnosis and management of partial/marginal placenta previa (PP), which have not yet been standardized globally [[4],[5],[6]].Elective cesarean section (CS) has generally been performed on patients with partial/marginal PP not only in our institute, but also in other perinatal centers in Japan. Partial/marginal PP patients have not yet delivered vaginally during the observation period. However, since some partial/marginal PP patients may be able to deliver vaginally, obstetricians need to be prepared to treat intrapartum massive hemorrhage at any time (24 ha day/365 days a year). Furthermore, medical care may be required during the night or at weekends. Thus, we perform the elective CS for all patients with partial/marginal PP in Japan.