Response letter to “Bleeding-related outcomes of low-risk total placenta previa are equivalent to those of partial/marginal placenta previa”

Response letter to “Bleeding-related outcomes of low-risk total placenta previa are equivalent to those of partial/marginal placenta previa”
复制标题

对“低风险完全性前置胎盘的出血相关结果与部分/边缘性前置胎盘的出血相关结果相同”的回复信

DOI:
10.1016/j.tjog.2022.08.011
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Takahashi Hironori
Takahashi Hironori
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ogoyama Manabu;Takahashi Hironori

文献摘要

相似文献

我们要感谢Yao等人对胎盘植入谱问题的有趣评论[[1],[2],[3]]。部分性/边缘性前置胎盘(PP)的诊断和处理存在困难,尚未在全球范围内标准化[[4],[5],[6]]。选择性剖宫产(CS)不仅在本研究所,而且在日本的其他围产中心,通常对部分性/边缘性PP患者进行。部分/边缘PP患者在观察期内尚未阴道分娩。然而,由于一些部分/边缘PP患者可能能够阴道分娩,产科医生需要随时准备治疗产时大出血(24 ha/天/一年365天)。此外,夜间或周末可能需要医疗护理。因此,我们对日本所有部分/边缘PP患者进行了择期CS。
We would like to thank Yao et al. for their interesting comments on the issue of placenta accreta spectrum [[1],[2],[3]]. Difficulties are associated with the diagnosis and management of partial/marginal placenta previa (PP), which have not yet been standardized globally [[4],[5],[6]].Elective cesarean section (CS) has generally been performed on patients with partial/marginal PP not only in our institute, but also in other perinatal centers in Japan. Partial/marginal PP patients have not yet delivered vaginally during the observation period. However, since some partial/marginal PP patients may be able to deliver vaginally, obstetricians need to be prepared to treat intrapartum massive hemorrhage at any time (24 ha day/365 days a year). Furthermore, medical care may be required during the night or at weekends. Thus, we perform the elective CS for all patients with partial/marginal PP in Japan.