Immune development and performance characteristics of Romney sheep selected for either resistance or resilience to gastrointestinal nematodes.
Immune development and performance characteristics of Romney sheep selected for either resistance or resilience to gastrointestinal nematodes.
复制标题
罗姆尼羊的免疫发育和性能特征选择对胃肠道线虫具有抵抗力或恢复力。
DOI:
10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.12.013
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
T. McNeilly
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Greer;J. McKenzie;R. McAnulty;J. Huntley;T. McNeilly
Immunological and performance characteristics were explored in Romney sheep from lines selected for either resistance or resilience to parasite infection. At a mean 78 days-of-age, twin lambs from a line selected for resistance (RT) and lambs from a line selected for resilience (RL) were infected with the intestinal nematodeTrichostrongylus colubriformisfor 100 days (I) while their twin remained as an uninfected control (C). Compared with RL, RT animals had lower levels of circulating CD4+T-cells (P = 0.003) but a greater proportion of these were activated (CD4+CD25+) in response to infection (P = 0.007). Differences between the lines in humoral immune responses to nematode infection varied with higher levels ofT. colubriformisspecific immunoglobulin (Ig) E in RT-I than RL-I (P = 0.002) but similar levels of both IgG (P = 0.926) and IgA (P = 0.321) responses. Temporal differences in the immune response also existed between the lines with RT-I animals displaying an earlier peak and more rapid reduction in FEC and an earlier peak inT. colubriformisspecific IgA. In addition, compared with their RT-C and RL-C counterparts, infection caused a 22% reduction in feed intake from day 56 (P = 0.001) with total feed intake reduced by 15% and 9% for RT-I and RL-I, respectively. Cumulative liveweight gain was greatest for RL animals (P = 0.026) and relative to RT-C and RL-C was reduced by 5.8 kg and 4.9 kg for RT-I and RL-I, respectively. Overall, the selection lines appear to have differences in immunological characteristics that are both dependent on, and independent of parasite infection. Further, the difference in growth in the uninfected animals coupled with the similar cost of infection suggests the lower liveweight gain of RT-I compared with RL-I may be due to inherent differences between the lines in their growth potential, rather than a greater cost of infection in animals selected for resistance.