Dual coding versus relational processing in memory for concrete and abstract words
Dual coding versus relational processing in memory for concrete and abstract words
复制标题
具体和抽象单词的双重编码与内存中的关系处理
DOI：
10.1080/09541440244000256
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Richardson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Richardson
在两个实验中，参与者判断名词是否符合特定的句子框架，然后接受以句子框架为线索的意想不到的回忆测试。具体名词比抽象名词被更好地回忆起来，有意义句子框架中的名词比异常句子框架中的名词被更好地回忆起来。在实验2中，自由回忆测验成绩与名词的具体性呈正相关，与句子框架的意义无关。从自由回忆到线索回忆的成绩提高与句子框架的意义呈正相关，而与名词的具体性关系不显着。具体性和意义性的影响没有表现出交互作用的迹象，无论是在它们对回忆绩效的影响上，还是在它们对线索回忆相对于自由回忆的优势的影响上。这些结果与表象和言语加工的双重编码理论是一致的，但与关系-区别性加工理论的两种不同解释都不一致。
In two experiments, participants judged whether nouns fitted particular sentence frames and then received an unanticipated recall test with the sentence frames as cues. Concrete nouns were better recalled than abstract nouns, and nouns presented in meaningful sentence frames were better recalled than nouns presented in anomalous sentence frames. In Experiment 2, performance in a test of free recall was positively related to the concreteness of the nouns but unrelated to the meaningfulness of the sentence frames. The increase in performance from free recall to cued recall was positively related to the meaningfulness of the sentence frames but not significantly related to the concreteness of the nouns. The effects of concreteness and meaningfulness showed no sign of any interaction either in their effects on recall performance or in their effects on the advantage of cued recall over free recall. These results are consistent with the dual-coding theory of imagery and verbal processes but are not consistent with either of two different interpretations of the relational-distinctiveness processing theory.