Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods
Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods
复制标题
通过协商投票进行协商公众咨询：标准和方法
DOI：
10.1002/hast.1316
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Fishkin, James S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fishkin, James S.
本文提出了关于涉及新技术和竞争价值或价值目标的有争议政策的公众咨询问题。它认为，深思熟虑的民意调查，由作者开发的方法，可以有效地采用具有代表性的样本进行深思熟虑的控制实验，以产生公众的考虑判断的图片。它还认为，根据最近的经验，这种协商可以成本效益高的分层随机抽样在线进行。它借鉴了包括气候和能源在内的各个问题领域的例子，以及在野外进行基因编辑的原型审议。它规定了深思熟虑的民意调查以及其他设计应该满足的标准，如果基于这些公共咨询产生的数据的政策建议要可信的话。
This article poses the problem of public consultation on contested policies involving new technologies and competing values or value‐laden goals. It argues that Deliberative Polling, an approach developed by the author, can be usefully employed to engage representative samples to deliberate in depth in controlled experiments so as to yield a picture of the public's considered judgments. It also argues from recent experience that such consultations can be cost effectively conducted online with stratified random samples. It draws on examples from various issue domains including climate and energy as well as prototype deliberations conducted on gene editing in the wild. It sets out criteria that Deliberative Polling, as well as other designs, should satisfy if policy recommendations based on the data generated by these public consultations are to be credible.